I recently had opportunity to take another look at the question, "What’s the differences between coaching and mentoring?" It's a good question and the post of June 5, 2011 in this BLOG seemed to really 'hit the nail on the head', so if you don't mind, I'd like to revisit it once again.
 |
Professor David Clutterbuck |
By way of an update:
1) My introduction to Professor
Clutterbuck has over the years transitioned into a wonderful
professional relationship. Thank you David for your input, friendship
and (if I may use the term here) MENTORSHIP! David operates under the name, "David Clutterbuck Partnership" and his Website is at: www.davidclutterbuckpartnership.com
2) Let me also mention that
the professional association (APEGA) was known as "APEGGA" at the time of the original post. It is now has known as "APEGA" - that is, the "Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Alberta". I’ve enjoyed attending a number of the APEGA Mentoring Conferences in the past and found them to be most valuable.
NOW - here is that very interesting look at the difference between "Coaching" and "Mentoring" ...
What’s the differences - coaching and mentoring?
People often ask: What’s the differences between coaching and mentoring? It’s
a good question, and if you’ve done some research on Mentorship, you
will have noticed that responses widely differ, leaving a lot of
confusion. To shed some light on this, here are some enlightening
comments from Professor David Clutterbuck,
David Clutterbuck Partnership. These are taken from the notes
that I took during his session at the APEGA Mentorship Conference in
Calgary, Alberta in October 2010, Please give them some thought, see if
they help you, and feel free to add your thoughts as a comment to this
post. Thanks.
David Clutterbuck’s comments: If you know where the conversation
is going, and have a clear scheme in your mind for the discussion ...
it’s not mentoring. Where you get to in a Mentoring conversation may
not be where you originally intended ... it’s a journey of discovery, a
creative conversation.
On the other hand, coaches typically have you do something. They observe
you and provide you with some feedback. As a result of following their
direction, improvements can quickly result. While there may be some
long-term develop that occurs, the main focus is on improving your
immediate results.
Coaching is always about performance, it’s about ‘doing’. Whereas,
Mentoring is about development, it’s about ‘becoming’ more than what you
are now.
Following the APEGA Mentorship Conference, I came across the
following from an article by Professor David Clutterbuck. It seemed to
address this puzzling question and was titled, ENSURING COACHING &
MENTORING DELIVER REAL VALUE TO INDIVIDUALS & ORGANISATIONS (2005).
Confusion about what is meant by coaching, mentoring and other forms of
development, he says, leads to a mismatch of expectations between
participants. Enjoy the balance of Clutterbuck’s explanation and then
share your comments to this post.
Terminological confusion: There are at least two major types or styles of both coaching and mentoring.
Traditional coaching, as typified in sports coaching is a system
for imparting skills and improving performance, using observation and
feedback by the coach.
Developmental coaching has the same goals, but uses a much
greater level of self- observation, reflection and self-feedback by the
learners – the coach’s role is essentially to help them coach
themselves. There is often a high emphasis on behaviour change.
Sponsoring mentoring, derived from US practice and still the
dominant model in N. America, is a relationship in which a senior person
uses their influence and experience to guide the career of someone more
junior. It is generally a one-way learning activity that places high
emphasis on career achievements and on direct intervention by the
mentor.
Developmental mentoring is largely independent of the power
issues, although the mentor’s greater experience is important. It is a
two-way exchange of learning, where personal growth is the critical
outcome (which may or may not lead to career achievement). The emphasis
is on helping the other learning partner do things for him/herself.
People describing themselves as executive coaches or life coaches, for
example, might operate in any of these styles, or a blend of several.
Successful learning relationships therefore need to define clearly what
each party expects in terms of approach and behaviours. It’s also
important to examine the experience and qualifications of people
offering coaching and mentoring services to determine how relevant they
are to the approach expected.